Argumentation 24 (2):139-152 (2010)
Abstract |
We are often faced with dilemmatic situations in which we must choose between alternative courses of action, both of which will have a bad outcome. It is commonly held that in such cases it is both uncontroversial and unproblematic that we have to choose the lesser evil. However, despite its frequent application in ethical decision-making, lesser evil reasoning is not well understood by most of its advocates and it thus occasions much misunderstanding and it presents a number of pitfalls. In this paper I shall thus, first, analyse the concept of a lesser evil; second, offer a critical assessment of lesser evil reasoning; third, discuss the most common pitfalls writers tend to fall into; and finally, explore the application of lesser evil reasoning to choices under uncertainty.
|
Keywords | Ethical reasoning Evil Lesser evil reasoning Practical reasoning Principle of the lesser evil |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1007/s10503-009-9158-7 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
View all 21 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Risk-Benefit Analysis: From a Logical Point of View. [REVIEW]Georg Spielthenner - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (2):161-170.
Similar books and articles
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-11-01
Total views
38 ( #298,746 of 2,506,101 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,101 )
2013-11-01
Total views
38 ( #298,746 of 2,506,101 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,101 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads