Indications of supernatural design in contemporary big bang cosmology

Ultimate Reality and Meaning 27 (4):265-287 (2004)

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,805

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-18

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Should We Believe in the Big Bang?: A Critique of the Integrity of Modern Cosmology.Graeme Rhook & Mark Zangari - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:228 - 237.
Theism and Physical Cosmology.Hans Halvorson - 2010 - In Charles Taliaferro, Victoria Harrison & Stewart Goetz (eds.), Routledge Companion to Theism.
Why Thomistic Philosophy of Nature Implies (Something Like) Big-Bang Cosmology.Travis Dumsday - 2011 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 85:69-78.
Can Science Detect Design in Nature? Van der Burgt & J. M. Peter - 2008 - Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society 2008:110 - 131.
Indications of Creation in Contemporary Astrophysics.Robert J. Spitzer - 2001 - Ultimate Reality and Meaning 24 (3):209-254.
Sociology of Modern Cosmology.Martín López Corredoira - 2009 - In J. A. Rubiño-Martín, J. A. Belmonte, F. Prada & A. Alberdi (eds.), Cosmology across Cultures. Astronomical Society of Pacific. pp. 66-73.