Are Thought Experiments Experiments?

In Thought experiments. New York: Oxford University Press (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter addresses the suspicion that “thought experiment” is systematically misleading. It itemizes how “thought experiment” is actually a systematically leading expression. This catalogue of hot tips raises a variety of issues ranging from how thought experiments differ from simulations to the ethics of fantasy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thought Experiments.Roy A. Sorensen - 1992 - Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press USA.
Thought Experiments.Roy A. Sorensen - 1992 - Oxford and New York: Oup Usa.
The Evolution of Thought Experiment.Roy A. Sorensen - 1992 - In Thought experiments. New York: Oxford University Press.
Thought Experiments.F. M. Kamm - 2022 - In Jonathan Gilmore & Lydia Goehr (eds.), A Companion to Arthur C. Danto. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley. pp. 68–75.
Thought Experiments in Ethics: A Contextualist Approach to the Grounding Problem.Leslie Anne Harland - 1999 - Dissertation, The University of British Columbia (Canada)
Scepticism About Thought Experiments.Roy A. Sorensen - 1992 - In Thought experiments. New York: Oxford University Press.
What is a thought experiment, anyhow?Massimo Pigliucci - 2006 - Philosophy Now (Nov/Dec):30.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Roy Sorensen
University of Texas at Austin

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references