Beyond Barbour: New Ways of Teaching the Relationship Between Science and Religion

In Berry Billingsley, Keith Chappell & Michael J. Reiss (eds.), Science and Religion in Education. Springer Verlag. pp. 15-18 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Virtually, every college course on science and religion starts the same way: an overview of Ian Barbour’s fourfold typology on the relationship between science and religion. He categorises interactions between these contested categories as fitting into four broad relationships of conflict, independence, dialogue or integration. This chapter introduces new pedagogical methods that reach Beyond Barbour for student introductions to science and religion.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/978-3-030-17234-3_2

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Barbour's Fourfold Way: Problems with His Taxonomy of Science‐religion Relationships.Geoffrey Cantor & Chris Kenny - 2001 - Zygon 36 (4):765-781.
Turning Barbour’s Model Inside Out: On Using Popular Culture to Teach About Science and Religion.Tuomas W. Manninen - 2019 - In Berry Billingsley, Keith Chappell & Michael J. Reiss (eds.), Science and Religion in Education. Springer Verlag. pp. 19-32.
Science, Religious Language, and Analogy.Andrew P. Porter - 1996 - Faith and Philosophy 13 (1):113-120.
Barbour's typologies and the contemporary debate on Islam and science.Stefano Bigliardi - 2012 - Zygon 47 (3):501-519.
Beyond Barbour: A Theology of Science from Ancient and Modern Thinkers.Tom C. B. McLeish - 2019 - In Berry Billingsley, Keith Chappell & Michael J. Reiss (eds.), Science and Religion in Education. Springer Verlag. pp. 33-45.
Beyond Barbour or back to basics? The future of science-and-religion and the Quest for unity.Taede A. Smedes - 2008 - Zygon 43 (1):235-258.
Taking science seriously without scientism: A response to Taede Smedes.Ian G. Barbour - 2008 - Zygon 43 (1):259-269.
Galileo’s Legacy.Dominic J. Balestra - 2011 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 85:1-14.
Science and religion: a search for synergism.Jared Michael Jones - 2005 - Dissertation, Texas a&M University
Some ways emerging adults are shaping the future of religion and science.Greg Cootsona - 2016 - Zygon 51 (3):557-572.
Taking theology and science seriously without category mistakes: A response to Ian Barbour.Taede A. Smedes - 2008 - Zygon 43 (1):271-276.
Argumen filosofis integrasi ilmu Dan agama perspektif pemikiran mull' sadr'.Arqom Kuswanjono - 2017 - Jurnal Filsafat 17 (3):324-349.
Galileo’s Legacy.Dominic J. Balestra - 2011 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 85:1-14.
Stephen Jay Gould and Karl Popper on Sciene and Religion.Amerigo Barzaghi & Josep Corcó - 2016 - Scientia et Fides 4 (2):417-436.
Beyond the Territories of Science and Religion.Emily Dumler-Winckler - 2019 - In Berry Billingsley, Keith Chappell & Michael J. Reiss (eds.), Science and Religion in Education. Springer Verlag. pp. 47-61.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
4 (#1,617,429)

6 months
1 (#1,470,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bethany Sollereder
University of Oxford

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references