- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Taking science seriously without scientism: A response to Taede Smedes
Zygon 43 (1):259-269 (2008)
Abstract
. In responding to Taede Smedes, I first examine his thesis that the recent dialogue between science and religion has been dominated by scientism and does not take theology seriously. I then consider his views on divine action, free will and determinism, and process philosophy. Finally I use the fourfold typology of Conflict, Independence, Dialogue, and Integration to discuss his proposal for the future of science and religionMy notes
Similar books and articles
Beyond Barbour or back to basics? The future of science-and-religion and the Quest for unity.Taede A. Smedes - 2008 - Zygon 43 (1):235-258.
How do we Know? Understanding in Science and Theology.Dirk Evers, Antje Jackelen & Taede Smedes (eds.) - 2010 - Forum Scientiarum.
Science and serious theology: Two paths for science and religion's future?Nathan J. Hallanger - 2010 - Zygon 45 (1):165-176.
Is our Universe Deterministic? Some Philosophical and Theological Reflections on an Elusive Topic.Taede A. Smedes - 2003 - Zygon 38 (4):955-979.
Scientific images and their social uses: an introduction to the concept of scientism.Iain Cameron - 1979 - Boston: Butterworth. Edited by David O. Edge.
Taking theology and science seriously without category mistakes: A response to Ian Barbour.Taede A. Smedes - 2008 - Zygon 43 (1):271-276.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
87 (#190,233)
6 months
10 (#250,275)
2009-01-28
Downloads
87 (#190,233)
6 months
10 (#250,275)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
An absolute distinction between faith and science: Contrast without compartmentalization.Hermen Kroesbergen - 2018 - Zygon 53 (1):9-28.
Science and Religion in Conflict, Part 1: Preliminaries.R. I. Damper - forthcoming - Foundations of Science:1-38.
Assessing the field of science and religion: Advice from the next generation.Michael S. Burdett - 2017 - Zygon 52 (3):747-763.
The Role of Authority in Science and Religion with Implications for Science Teaching and Learning.Mike U. Smith - 2013 - Science & Education 22 (3):605-634.
Science and Religion: Moving Beyond the Credibility Strategy.Victoria Lorrimar - 2020 - Zygon 55 (3):812-823.
References found in this work
Issues in Science and Religion.Ian G. Barbour - 1967 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (3):259-261.
Chaos, Complexity, and God: Divine Action and Scientism.Taede A. Smedes - 2006 - Ars Disputandi 6:1566-5399.
Beyond Barbour or back to basics? The future of science-and-religion and the Quest for unity.Taede A. Smedes - 2008 - Zygon 43 (1):235-258.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo