Objective Law

In Allan Gotthelf & Gregory Salmieri (eds.), A Companion to Ayn Rand. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 209–221 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter presents some of Ayn Rand's express condemnations of non‐objective law and then indicates the underlying principles of government that explain these assessments. It also discusses the implications of Rand's view for the traditional Natural Law‐Positivism dispute over the authority of law and for the moral status of the Rule of Law. In particular, the chapter shows why the Rule of Law, on what she regards as a proper conception of objective law, is emphatically a moral ideal. The broad scope of Rand's conception of objective law is explained not only by her view of the function of government, but also by her understanding of objectivity itself. In the sense in which the term applies to man‐made things, objectivity is normative. Rand's analysis suggests that the propriety of the Rule of Law rests, at bottom, in its objectivity. The Rule of Law banishes subjectivism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Objective-Subjective Dichotomy and Rand's Trichotomy.Arnold Baise - 2017 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 17 (2):227-237.
Probability, Objectivity, and Induction.Arnold Baise - 2013 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 13 (2):81-95.
Mind, Introspection, and "The Objective".Roger E. Bissell - 2008 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 10 (1):3 - 84.
Ayn Rand and Deducing 'Ought' from 'Is'.Lachlan Doughney - 2012 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 12 (1):151-168.
The First Russian Biography of Ayn Rand.Anastasiya Vasilievna Grigorovskaya - 2021 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 21 (2):244-247.
The Objective Status of Subjective Facts.Howard Sankey - 2023 - Metaphysica: International Journal for Ontology and Metaphysics 24 (2):175-179.
Objective Oughts and a Puzzle about Futurity.Marra Alessandra - 2016 - In Olivier Roy, Allard Tamminga & Malte Willer (eds.), Deontic Logic and Normative Systems. London, UK: College Publications. pp. 171-186.
Can the World Help Us in Fixing the Reference of Natural Kind Terms?Igor Douven & Jaap Van Brakel - 1998 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 29 (1):59 - 70.
Why moral judgments can be objective: Tibor R. Machan.Tibor R. Machan - 2008 - Social Philosophy and Policy 25 (1):100-125.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-15

Downloads
12 (#1,085,763)

6 months
10 (#268,500)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Morality of Law.Lon L. Fuller - 1964 - Ethics 76 (3):225-228.
Objectivity and the Rule of Law.Matthew Kramer - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Rule of Law and its Limits.Andrei Marmor - 2004 - Law and Philosophy 23 (1):1-43.
Natural law theory.Mark C. Murphy - 2004 - In Martin P. Golding & William A. Edmundson (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 15--28.

View all 6 references / Add more references