How Might Financial Aid Form a Part of the Negative Duty Not to Harm in the Case of Global Poverty?

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 118 (3) (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The pro tanto duty not to harm is arguably the most widely accepted basis for moral demand. However, in the case of global poverty, even if we accept that individual members of wealthier nations are responsible for harming the global poor (through their constitution of, or participation in or with, global institutions that harm), it remains difficult to claim that individuals violate a negative duty in doing so. For an agent to hold a duty, that duty must be at least (a) recognizable to a reasonably competent observer, and (b) fulfillable, two criteria which do not appear to be met. This paper argues that we have misunderstood the way in which the global community harms the global poor. As a result, there are a range of acts—the provision of financial aid—which the global community largely fails to undertake and which form a part of violating the negative duty not to harm. In relation to these global acts, it is straightforward for individuals both to recognize what they would need to do to avoid participating in the harm of global poverty and to achieve that avoidance: individuals simply need to provide financial aid. As such, assuming that individuals are culpable for the harms committed by intersecting global institutions, then their participation in harm also violates a negative duty not to inflict such harm. This opens up a further remedial duty to provide financial aid for past harms committed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The duty to eradicate global poverty: Positive or negative?Pablo Gilabert - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (5):537-550.
Punishing states that cause global poverty.Thom Brooks - 2007 - William Mitchell Law Review 33 (2):519-32.
Rigorist cosmopolitanism.Shmuel Nili - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (3):260-287.
Pogge, poverty, and war.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2017 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 16 (4):446-469.
How Demanding is the Duty of Assistance?Mark Navin - 2013 - In Win-Chiat Lee & Helen Stacy (eds.), Economic Justice. Springer. pp. 205-220.
Duties to the Global Poor and Minimalism about Global Justice.Alex Rajczi - 2016 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (1):65-89.
Duties to the Global Poor and Minimalism about Global Justice.Alex Rajczi - 2016 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (1):65-89.
Business Strategy and Poverty Alleviation.Alan E. Singer - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 66 (2-3):225-231.
Poverty, negative duties and the global institutional order.Magnus Reitberger - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (4):379-402.
Poverty and the Moral Significance of Contribution.Gerhard Øverland - 2005 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 2 (3):299-315.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-18

Downloads
42 (#378,786)

6 months
3 (#976,504)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Leonie Smith
Lancaster University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What Do We Owe the Global Poor?Debra Satz - 2005 - Ethics and International Affairs 19 (1):47-54.
Should We Stop Thinking About Poverty in Terms of Helping the Poor?Alan Patten - 2005 - Ethics and International Affairs 19 (1):19-27.
Action and Passion.Anton Ford - 2014 - Philosophical Topics 42 (1):13-42.

View all 6 references / Add more references