Does Kant have a pre-Newtonian picture of force in the balance argument? An account of how the balance argument works

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):470-480 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.10.013

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

An arbitrarily short reply to Sheldon Smith on instantaneous velocities.Frank Arntzenius - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (2):281-282.
An arbitrarily short reply to Sheldon Smith on instantaneous velocities.Frank Arntzenius - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (2):281-282.
The Cosmological Argument: A Newtonian Challenge to Hume.Michael Granado - 2016 - Circumscribere: International Journal for the History of Science 17:1-17.
Sewall Wright, shifting balance theory, and the hardening of the modern synthesis.Yoichi Ishida - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 61:1-10.
Kuhn vs. Popper on criticism and dogmatism in science, part II: How to strike the balance.Darrell P. Rowbottom - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (2):161-168.
Kant on attractive and repulsive force : the balancing argument.Daniel Warren - 2010 - In Michael Friedman, Mary Domski & Michael Dickson (eds.), Discourse on a New Method: Reinvigorating the Marriage of History and Philosophy of Science. Open Court.
Theories that narrate the world: Ronald A. Fisher's mass selection and Sewall Wright's shifting balance.Alirio Rosales - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 62:22-30.
The eagle and the starlings: Galileo’s argument for the autonomy of science—how pertinent is it today?Hugh Lacey & Pablo R. Mariconda - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):122-131.
David Hume's no-miracles argument begets a valid No-Miracles Argument.Colin Howson - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 54:41-45.
Darwinism after Mendelism: the case of Sewall Wright’s intellectual synthesis in his shifting balance theory of evolution.Jonathan Hodge - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (1):30-39.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-11-28

Downloads
58 (#283,960)

6 months
6 (#587,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sheldon Smith
University of California, Los Angeles

Citations of this work

The early Kant’s Newtonianism.Eric Watkins - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):429-437.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science.Immanuel Kant - 1970 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Michael Friedman.
Prolegomena to any future metaphysics.Immanuel Kant - 2007 - Journal of Philosophy (16):507-508.
Kant’s third law of mechanics: The long shadow of Leibniz.Marius Stan - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):493-504.
The Laws of Motion from Newton to Kant.Eric Watkins - 1997 - Perspectives on Science 5 (3):311-348.

Add more references