“Clinging Stubbornly to the Antithesis of Assumptions”: On the Difference Between Hegel’s and Spinoza’s Systems of Philosophy

Research in Phenomenology 51 (3):351-371 (2021)

Abstract

This essay re-examines Hegel’s critique of Spinoza’s Ethics, focusing on the question of method. Are the axioms and definitions unmotivated presuppositions that make the attainment of absolute knowledge impossible in principle, as Hegel charges? This essay develops a new reading of the Ethics to defend it from this critique. I argue that Hegel reads Spinoza as if his system were constructed only according to the mathematical second kind of knowledge, ignoring Spinoza’s clear preference for knowledge of the third kind. The Ethics, I argue, is a book with several layers: it is at once a deductive mathematical system, and a handbook to aid the intuitive power of the active philosophical reader. The letter of each text may be identical, but they have little else in common – Pierre Menard’s rewriting of Don Quixote given systematic philosophical form.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,856

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-16

Downloads
5 (#1,212,940)

6 months
1 (#386,016)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel J. Smith
University of Memphis

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Logic of Expression in Deleuze's Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza: A Strategy of Engagement.Simon Duffy - 2004 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (1):47 – 60.
The Differential Point of View of the Infinitesimal Calculus in Spinoza, Leibniz and Deleuze.Simon Duffy - 2006 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 37 (3):286-307.
Diferença e Singularidade, Notas Sobre a Crítica de Hegel e Spinoza.João Emiliano Fortaleza de Aquino - 2006 - Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (28):109-133.
Hegel’s Epistemic Turn—Or Spinoza's?Heidi M. Ravven - 2003 - Idealistic Studies 33 (2/3):195-202.
Hegel’s Idealist Reading of Spinoza.Samuel Newlands - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (2):100-108.
Prime Ricerche di Hegel. [REVIEW]B. G. - 1960 - Review of Metaphysics 13 (3):532-532.
Acosmism or Weak Individuals?: Hegel, Spinoza, and the Reality of the Finite.Yitzhak Y. Melamed - 2010 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (1):pp. 77-92.
Salvation From Despair. [REVIEW]R. M. K. - 1974 - Review of Metaphysics 28 (2):347-348.