Why Market Reform Succeeded and Democracy Failed in Russia

Social Research: An International Quarterly 76 (1):1-28 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Postcommunist transformation has led to quite different results. The starkest example is Russia, which has become a thriving market economy with an average real growth of 7 percent a year for a decade from 1999 to 2008, but Freedom House ranks it as a "not free" or authoritarian state. In this article, I define what I mean by saying that Russia is a market economy but not democratic. To clarify how this happened, I shall compare democracy to policymaking with regard to a market economy in the years after the collapse of the Soviet Union, which I consider to have undergone a revolution. Finally, I shall consider the contradiction that has arisen between an increasingly authoritarian state and an ever wealthier market economy. My argument is that this contradiction is too great to last for long

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Boris Yeltsin and the Failure of Shock Therapy.Christopher Huygen - 2012 - Constellations (University of Alberta Student Journal) 3 (1).
Is the Market a Sphere of Social Freedom?Timo Jütten - 2015 - Critical Horizons 16 (2):187-203.
Democratic Capitalism: A Reply to Critics.John Tomasi - 2014 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 26 (3-4):439-471.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-26

Downloads
40 (#113,921)

6 months
40 (#385,383)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references