Joy

Journal of Value Inquiry 45 (4):419-431 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Joy is often mentioned in discussion of theories of hedonism, happiness, desire, or religion, but is rarely considered in itself. Consequently, much about the nature of joy remains unclear. Is it, for example, a distinctive state? A feeling? An emotion? Why is it experienced? Does it have a functional role? Through discussion of joy's nature, role, and importance, it will be demonstrated that joy can indeed be defined: as an intense, positively-valenced emotion, whose inherent connection to the desire for self-preservation renders it inappropriate for providing the basis for theories of morality.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-11-08

Downloads
132 (#142,412)

6 months
24 (#121,679)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hilary Kathleen Sloan
McGill University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two conceptions of happiness.Richard Kraut - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (2):167-197.
Feelings.Gilbert Ryle - 1951 - Philosophical Quarterly 1 (2):193-205.
Spinoza on self-preservation and self-destruction.Mitchell Gabhart - 1999 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 37 (4):613-628.

Add more references