A note on an argument of Quine's

Philosophical Studies 17 (6):91 - 93 (1966)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf01324510

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,813

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Van Inwagen and the Quine-Putnam indispensability argument.Mitchell O. Stokes - 2007 - Erkenntnis 67 (3):439 - 453.
Quine, Putnam, and the ‘Quine–Putnam’ Indispensability Argument.David Liggins - 2008 - Erkenntnis 68 (1):113 - 127.
A note on an argument of Quine.Arthur Smullyan - 1956 - Mind 65 (258):255-258.
Quine's double standard: undermining the indispensability argument via the indeterminacy of reference.Otávio Bueno - 2003 - Principia 7 (1-2):17-39.
3. Cats, Dogs, and so on.John P. Burgess - 2008 - In Dean W. Zimmerman (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics. Oxford University Press. pp. 4--56.
Quine's holism and functionalist holism.M. McDermott - 2001 - Mind 110 (440):977-1025.
Intrinsic Explanation and Field’s Dispensabilist Strategy.Russell Marcus - 2013 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21 (2):163-183.
Indispensability arguments and instrumental nominalism.Richard Pettigrew - 2012 - Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (4):687-709.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#370,261)

6 months
9 (#352,458)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Quine’s Poor Tom.Tristan Grøtvedt Haze - 2019 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 15 (1):5-16.
Reply to Widerker.Richard Sharvy - 1973 - Philosophia 3 (4):453-455.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references