The content of science, the methodology of science and Hempel's models of explanation and confirmation

Philosophical Studies 94 (1-2):21-34 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2004

DOI

10.1023/a:1004446919734

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Theories and the transitivity of confirmation.Mary Hesse - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (1):50-63.
Goodman, 'grue' and Hempel.C. A. Hooker - 1968 - Philosophy of Science 35 (3):232-247.
The paradox of confirmation.Branden Fitelson - 2006 - Philosophy Compass 1 (1):95–113.
Confirmation and prediction.G. H. Merrill - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (1):98-117.
What is explained in science?Barbara Tuchańska - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (1):102-119.
Hempel and Oppenheim on explanation.Rolf Eberle, David Kaplan & Richard Montague - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (4):418-428.
The Logic of Confirmation and Theory Assessment.Franz Huber - 2005 - In L. Behounek & M. Bilkova (eds.), The Logica Yearbook. Filosofia.
The philosophy of Carl G. Hempel: studies in science, explanation, and rationality.Carl G. Hempel (ed.) - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Philosophy of science today.Sidney Morgenbesser - 1967 - New York,: Basic Books. Edited by Sidney Morgenbesser.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
98 (#174,395)

6 months
16 (#151,161)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Contextualism, explanation and the social sciences.Harold Kincaid - 2004 - Philosophical Explorations 7 (3):201 – 218.
A Conversation on Grounding.Mark Wilson & Chris Daly - 2023 - The Monist 106 (3):317-325.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references