From Definition to Criticism

Espes 8 (1):20-26 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is the sense of the question “What is art?” It may seem that the only adequate answer will be the effort to define the notion of art, that is, the exclusive purpose of this question is the classification of art, encompassing all artifacts regarded as works of art and distinguishing them from those do not belong to art. The study points to the connection between our classification of artifacts and our evaluation and understanding of them. It also recalls reflections on the subject “What is Art?”, which does not even attempt to define it. Their aim is different: to change our understanding, evaluation or explication of art.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What, After All, Is Art?Alexandra Mouriki, Antonis Vaos & Alexandra Mouriki-Zervou - 2010 - International Journal of the Arts in Society: Annual Review 5 (2):129-138.
Kunstart.Henning Tegtmeyer - 2008 - Walter de Gruyter.
Artifacts, art works, and agency.Randall R. Dipert - 1993 - Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Languages of art and art criticism.Monroe C. Beardsley - 1978 - Erkenntnis 12 (1):95 - 118.
Generalization In The Philosophy Of Art.J. Kemp - 1958 - Philosophy 33 (125):147 - 157.
Philosophy of Art and the Art of Cinema.Abdullah Kaygi - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 1:141-146.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-10

Downloads
4 (#1,642,475)

6 months
4 (#1,004,582)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references