Artifacts, art works, and agency

Philadelphia: Temple University Press (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is the first philosophical study of artifacts that is book length. In it Randall Dipert develops a theory of what artifacts are and applies it extensively to one of the most complex and intriguing kind of artifacts, art works. He presents his own account of what agents, intentions, and actions are, then uses these notions to clarify what it is for an agent to "make" something. From this starting point, he develops a full theory of artifacts and other artificial things - and, especially, a theory of art works and performances of art works as artifacts. He proposes a theory of nature and of the value of nature as what is essentially nonartificial. Two chapters are devoted to value considerations: merit in artifacts generally, and the evaluation of art works and performance art as artifacts or intentional gestures. Believing that a developed theory of action and philosophy of mind is necessary for a developed aesthetics and philosophy of art, Dipert relies on classical and contemporary research on agency, actions, and intentions, and on the intentionalist theory of mental objects of Brentano and Meinong. Dipert considers artifacts to be physical entities, but he also includes in the definition thoughts, utterances, and performances. This vast category encompasses everyday household objects and tools, streets and edifices, as well as communicative and artistic artifacts. Especially with regard to artistic artifacts, Dipert proposes a theory of expression and communication as actions and extensively discusses the problems of interpreting and recognizing actions, artifacts, and art works.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are there counterexamples to aesthetic theories of art?Nick Zangwill - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2):111–118.
Culture and art: an anthology.Lars Aagaard-Mogensen (ed.) - 1976 - Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.
Conceptual Art Is Not What It Seems.Dominic McIver Lopes - 2007 - In Peter Goldie & Elisabeth Schellekens (eds.), Philosophy and conceptual art. New York: Oxford University Press.
Art, Artifacts, and Regarded Intentions.Randall R. Dipert - 1986 - American Philosophical Quarterly 23 (4):401 - 408.
On artifacts and works of art.Risto Hilpinen - 1992 - Theoria 58 (1):58-82.
Why exhibit works of art?Ananda K. Coomaraswamy - 1941 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 1 (2/3):27-41.
Works and worlds of art.Nicholas Wolterstorff - 1980 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
125 (#141,919)

6 months
17 (#142,329)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Randall Dipert
PhD: Indiana University, Bloomington; Last affiliation: University at Buffalo

Citations of this work

A taxonomy of cognitive artifacts: Function, information, and categories.Richard Heersmink - 2013 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (3):465-481.
Ontology.Barry Smith - 2003 - In Luciano Floridi (ed.), Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 155-166.
Function essentialism about artifacts.Tim Juvshik - 2021 - Philosophical Studies (9):2943-2964.
Social Ontology.Brian Epstein - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Artifacts and mind-dependence.Tim Juvshik - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):9313-9336.

View all 48 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references