What is Legal Reasoning?

International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique:1-20 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pursuant to the aims and scope of the Special Issue it is part of, this invited contribution seeks to shed new light on the nature and working logic of legal reasoning. It does so by engaging with two of the most authoritative views on the subject which have recently been put forward in the Common law world—namely, Lord Hoffmann’s, and Larry Alexander and Emily Sherwin’s. A key-concern of the Anglophone debate on legal reasoning is whether it is a specialistic type of reasoning requiring ad hoc education and training, or ordinary reasoning subject to ordinary rules of language (i.e. sentence construction, interpretation, etc.). The article argues that compelling though they are, these sorts of enquiries do not help to understand what legal reasoning really is and how it operates. In particular, it argues that if we are to understand what legal reasoning is and how it works, we ought to examine the propositions it aims to craft and support. In so arguing, the article further shows that exploring law’s nature and operations as an intellectual means for social ordering also helps to understand how law works as a regulatory phenomenon more generally.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Getting into Mischief: On What it Means to Appeal to the U.S. Constitution.Daniel Frost - 2015 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 28 (2):267-287.
Demystifying Legal Reasoning.Larry Alexander & Emily Sherwin (eds.) - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
Law and the New Logics.H. Patrick Glenn & Lionel D. Smith (eds.) - 2017 - Cambridge University Press.
Knowledge Construction in Legal Reasoning: A Three Stage Model of Law’s Evolution in Practical Discourse.Olaf Tans - 2018 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 31 (1):1-19.
Semiotic Perspectives on Forensic and Legal Linguistics: Unifying Approaches in the Language of the Legal Process and Language in Evidence.David Wright & Isabel Picornell - 2024 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 37 (2):293-304.
Legal Reasoning: Arguments from Comparison.Thomas Coendet - 2016 - Archiv Fuer Rechts Und Sozialphilosphie 102 (4):476-507.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-09

Downloads
5 (#1,559,645)

6 months
5 (#836,928)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references