Science and Religion: Reply to John F. Miller

Religious Studies 6 (3):281 - 287 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A scientist's approach to religion.Carl Wallace Miller - 1947 - New York,: The Macmillan company.
Reply to David L. Miller's comments.Carl G. Hempel & Paul Oppenheim - 1948 - Philosophy of Science 15 (4):350-352.
A reply to 'some new aspects of relativity: Comments on Zahar's paper'.Arthur I. Miller - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (3):252-256.
Einstein's debt to lorentz: A reply to Feyerabend and Miller.Elie Zahar - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (1):49-60.
The role of knowledge in Western religion.John Herman Randall - 1958 - Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
The straight and narrow rule of induction: A reply to dr Bub and mr Radner.David Miller - 1968 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):145-152.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
5 (#1,522,914)

6 months
1 (#1,498,742)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Philosophy of religion in the journals.Robert L. Perkins - 1974 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5 (3):59-64.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references