The emancipatory role of information and communication technology

Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 8 (1):57-84 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of internet filtering, and its impact on marginalized groups including non‐governmental organizations, female activists, ethnic, and religious minorities, the younger generation and the increase of the digital divide in Iran.Design/methodology/approachThe paper raises two main questions: to what extent do information and communications technologies and in particular, the internet, promote freedom of speech, and gender equality in Iran? What is the impact of state censorship and ICT filtering on these activities? To answer these research questions, the author uses narratives of the internet's usage along with a comparison study with other Middle Eastern countries to analyze the impact of ICTs on citizen's freedom of expression.FindingsThe paper argues that restrictions imposed on ICT tools and services by the Government of Iran which has been claimed to protect country's national security against the corruption and immorality imposed by Western countries not only affect the expansion of ICTs negatively but also civil liberties – thus increasing the digital divide internally, regionally, as well as on a global scale.Research limitations/implicationsAlbeit this research is limited to the case study of Iran, the author believes that lessens learned from the Iran's case study can be applied to other Islamic countries and in particular countries located in the Middle East region.Practical implicationsICT tools and services such as the internet and short message service are effective emancipatory media for citizens' participation and mobilization in democratic processes.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to the existing knowledge and understanding of the impact of ICTs on freedom and democracy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is so bad about internet content regulation?John Weckert - 2000 - Ethics and Information Technology 2 (2):105-111.
A universal model for the normative evaluation of internet information.Edward H. Spence - 2009 - Ethics and Information Technology 11 (4):243-253.
Information technology from Homer to DENDRAL.J. E. Tiles - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (2):205-220.
Real friends: How the internet can Foster friendship. [REVIEW]Adam Briggle - 2008 - Ethics and Information Technology 10 (1):71-79.
Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization.Engin Bozdag - 2013 - Ethics and Information Technology 15 (3):209-227.
Academic personality and the commodification of academic texts.Andrew Alexandra - 2002 - Ethics and Information Technology 4 (4):279-286.
Spaces of the Hilltop: A Case Study of Community/Academic Interaction.Aaron Knochel & Dickie Selfe - 2012 - Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy 16 (3):n3.
Controlling access to the internet: The role of filtering. [REVIEW]R. S. Rosenberg - 2001 - Ethics and Information Technology 3 (1):35-54.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-19

Downloads
40 (#396,692)

6 months
12 (#210,071)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references