Regulation, politics, and interest groups: What do we learn from an historical approach? [Book Review]

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (2-3):259-269 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In The Regulated Economy: A Historical Approach to Political Economy, Claudia Goldin and Gary D. Libecap use case studies to defend and expand upon the notion that elements of civil society—“special interests”—manage to “capture” government regulators and make the state serve their selfish ends. The evidence of the case studies themselves, however, and the occurrence of such anomalies as the deregulatory movement, suggest that government actors often enjoy considerable autonomy in regulating civil society, and that readily manipulable currents in public opinion are also important.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Autonomy of the Democratic State: Rejoinder to Carpenter, Ginsberg, and Shefter.Samuel DeCanio - 2007 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 19 (1):187-196.
Critical semiotic analysis and cultural political economy.Bob Jessop * - 2004 - Critical Discourse Studies 1 (2):159-174.
Civil Society and the State.Simone Chambers & Jeffrey Kopstein - 2006 - In John S. Dryzek, Bonnie Honig & Anne Phillips (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford University Press.
Public Policy rights international non-governmental organizations in development of global civil society.N. Konon - 2014 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 1 (24):54-61.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-18

Downloads
7 (#1,413,139)

6 months
22 (#129,165)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references