Designing judicial review: A comment on Schauer

Law and Philosophy 22 (s 3-4):241-246 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No Abstract

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is judicial review democratic? A comment on Harel.Larry Alexander - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (s 3-4):277-283.
Neutrality and judicial review.Frederick Schauer - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (s 3-4):217-240.
Weak and strong judicial review.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (s 3-4):381-392.
Judicial Review, Rights, and Democracy.Horacio Spector - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (3-4):285-334.
Civic liberalism and the 'dialogical model'of judicial review.Colin Farrelly - 2008 - In Colin Patrick Farrelly & Lawrence Solum (eds.), Virtue jurisprudence. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 489 - 531.
Civic liberalism and the 'dialogical model'of judicial review.Colin Farrelly - 2008 - In Colin Patrick Farrelly & Lawrence Solum (eds.), Virtue jurisprudence. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 489 - 531.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
22 (#701,318)

6 months
4 (#1,005,811)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Emily Sherwin
Cornell University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The generality of rights.Frederick Schauer - 2000 - Legal Theory 6 (3):323-336.
Neutrality and judicial review.Frederick Schauer - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (s 3-4):217-240.

Add more references