Three methods of ethics: A debate

Philosophical Review 109 (1):125-128 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In The Methods of Ethics, Sidgwick took seriously egoism, utilitarianism, and commonsense morality. Virtue ethics was treated as part of commonsense morality. Three Methods, reflecting recent tastes, considers Kant, consequentialism, and virtue ethics. Oddly, it does not reflect the major development since Sidgwick—the revival of contractualism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Methodological triangulation in nursing research.Mark Risjord, Margaret Moloney & Sandra Dunbar - 2001 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (1):40-59.
Recasting the "Ethics of Virtue/Ethics of Duty" Debate.David Schenck Jr - 1976 - Journal of Religious Ethics 4 (2):269 - 286.
The Role of Ethics Committees in Public Debate.Lonneke M. Poort - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):19-35.
Organizing ethics: A stakeholder debate. [REVIEW]Harry Hummels - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (13):1403-1419.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-12

Downloads
8 (#1,315,307)

6 months
2 (#1,192,898)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references