Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):353-354 (2002)

Perruchet & Vinter (P&V) ground their arguments in a view they call “the mentalistic tradition.” Here I point out that such a view has already been advocated by two old masters of psychological science, William James and James Gibson, as well as by the philosopher Merleau-Ponty. In fact, in the writings of these older thinkers, arguments very similar to those presented in the target article are found.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x02470069
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,512
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
23 ( #495,641 of 2,520,896 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,457 of 2,520,896 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes