14 found
Order:
  1.  58
    Three legs of the missing heritability problem.Lucas J. Matthews & Eric Turkheimer - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 93 (C):183-191.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  2.  51
    Galton's Quincunx: Probabilistic causation in developmental behavior genetics.Jonathan Michael Kaplan & Eric Turkheimer - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 88 (C):60-69.
  3.  88
    Across the great divide: pluralism and the hunt for missing heritability.Lucas J. Matthews & Eric Turkheimer - 2019 - Synthese 198 (3):2297-2311.
    Genetic explanation of complex human behavior presents an excellent test case for pluralism. Although philosophers agree that successful scientific investigation of behavior is pluralistic, there remains disagreement regarding integration and elimination—is the plurality of approaches here to stay, or merely a waystation on the road to monism? In this paper we introduce an issue taken very seriously by scientists yet mostly ignored by philosophers—the missing heritability problem—and assess its implications for disagreement among pluralists. We argue that the missing heritability problem, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  4.  78
    An Early History of the Heritability Coefficient Applied to Humans.Stephen M. Downes & Eric Turkheimer - 2022 - Biological Theory 17 (2):126-137.
    Fisher’s 1918 paper accomplished two distinct goals: unifying discrete Mendelian genetics with continuous biometric phenotypes and quantifying the variance components of variation in complex human characteristics. The former contributed to the foundation of modern quantitative genetics; the latter was adopted by social scientists interested in the pursuit of Galtonian nature-nurture questions about the biological and social origins of human behavior, especially human intelligence. This historical divergence has produced competing notions of the estimation of variance ratios referred to as heritability. Jay (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  5.  49
    Wrestling with Social and Behavioral Genomics: Risks, Potential Benefits, and Ethical Responsibility.Michelle N. Meyer, Paul S. Appelbaum, Daniel J. Benjamin, Shawneequa L. Callier, Nathaniel Comfort, Dalton Conley, Jeremy Freese, Nanibaa' A. Garrison, Evelynn M. Hammonds, K. Paige Harden, Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, Alicia R. Martin, Daphne Oluwaseun Martschenko, Benjamin M. Neale, Rohan H. C. Palmer, James Tabery, Eric Turkheimer, Patrick Turley & Erik Parens - 2023 - Hastings Center Report 53 (S1):2-49.
    In this consensus report by a diverse group of academics who conduct and/or are concerned about social and behavioral genomics (SBG) research, the authors recount the often‐ugly history of scientific attempts to understand the genetic contributions to human behaviors and social outcomes. They then describe what the current science—including genomewide association studies and polygenic indexes—can and cannot tell us, as well as its risks and potential benefits. They conclude with a discussion of responsible behavior in the context of SBG research. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  6.  26
    Genetic Prediction.Eric Turkheimer - 2015 - Hastings Center Report 45 (S1):32-38.
    The fundamental reason that the genetics of behavior has remained so controversial for so long is that the layer of theory between data and their interpretation is thicker and more opaque than in more established areas of science. The finding that variations in tiny snippets of DNA have small but detectable relations to variation in behavior surprises no one, at least no one who was paying attention to the twin studies. How such snippets of DNA are related to differences in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  7.  36
    Heritability and biological explanation.Eric Turkheimer - 1998 - Psychological Review 105 (4):782-791.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  8.  30
    Spit for Science and the Limits of Applied Psychiatric Genetics.Eric Turkheimer & Sarah Rodock Greer - forthcoming - Philosophy Psychiatry and Psychology.
    The research program Spit For Science was launched at Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) in 2011. Since then, more than 10,000 freshmen have been enrolled in the program, filling out extensive questionnaires about their drinking, general substance use, and related behaviors, and also contributing saliva for genotyping. The goals of the program, as initially stated by the investigators, were to find the genes underlying the heritability of alcohol use and related behaviors, and in addition to put genetic knowledge to work in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  47
    The Social Science Blues.Eric Turkheimer - 2019 - Hastings Center Report 49 (3):45-47.
    At the dawn of the new century, Robert Plomin was gloomy. As he recounts in Blueprint: How DNA Makes Us Who We Are, attempts to find the DNA responsible for the heritability of behavior failed. Month after month, journals would report new findings of specific genes for behavioral phenotypes, but they never replicated. One amazing genomic methodology after another was developed in biological genetics and applied to medicine, where it succeeded, and then to human behavior, where it failed. This was (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  10.  36
    This time I mean it: The nature–nurture debate is over.Eric Turkheimer - 2022 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45:e177.
    The target article is skeptical of the heritability concept while maintaining an old-fashioned point of view about it. As a descriptive statistic, it is to be expected that heritability goes up and down in different circumstances, but the relationship between heritability coefficients and the biological processes that underlie them is difficult to specify, and may be impossible in humans.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  13
    On the big list of causes.Eric Turkheimer - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e205.
    The methodological shift from twin studies to genome-wide association studies (GWASs) diminished estimates of true genetic causation underlying statistical heritability of behavioral differences. The sum total of causal genetic influence on behavior is not zero, but, (a) no one cited in the target article ever thought this was the case, and (b) there is still little known about concrete instances of genetic causation.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  56
    Meta-perception for pathological personality traits: Do we know when others think that we are difficult?Thomas F. Oltmanns, Marci E. J. Gleason, E. David Klonsky & Eric Turkheimer - 2005 - Consciousness and Cognition 14 (4):739-751.
    The self allows us to reflect on our own behavior and to imagine what others think of us. Clinical experience suggests that these abilities may be impaired in people with personality disorders. They do not recognize the impact that their behavior has on others, and they have difficulty understanding how they are seen by others. We collected information regarding pathological personality traits—using both self and peer report measures—from groups of people who knew each other well . In previous papers, we (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  13.  28
    Is H2 = 0 a null hypothesis anymore?Eric Turkheimer & Irving I. Gottesman - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (3):410-411.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  14.  84
    Does your family make you smarter: Nature, nurture, and human autonomy, James Flynn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016), 258, Softcover, ISBN-10: 1316604462. [REVIEW]Lucas J. Matthews & Eric Turkheimer - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 65:35-40.