A Response to Penders: The Disvalue of Vagueness in Authorship

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (1):17-17 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Value of Vagueness in the Politics of Authorship.Bart Penders - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (1):13-15.
The Virus of Vagueness in Authorship.David Shaw - 2016 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (3):361-362.
Contextualism about vagueness and higher-order vagueness.Patrick Greenough - 2005 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 79 (1):167–190.
Works, Authors, Co‐Authorship, and Power: A Response to Hick.Anton Killin - 2015 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 73 (3):334-337.
Varieties of vagueness.Trenton Merricks - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (1):145-157.
Authorship, Co‐Authorship, and Multiple Authorship.Darren Hudson Hick - 2014 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72 (2):147-156.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-16

Downloads
3 (#1,716,188)

6 months
1 (#1,478,456)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David M. Shaw
University of Basel

Citations of this work

The Ninth Circle: Who and What Do We Trust In Today’s World?Michael Ashby - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (1):7-12.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Value of Vagueness in the Politics of Authorship.Bart Penders - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (1):13-15.

Add more references