Abstract

Ethical questions rarely present themselves in an abstract manner. Situations we encounter in our daily personal and professional lives sometimes cause us to hesitate, to reflect, even for a moment, about the ethical quality of possible modes of acting or withholding action . These situations can be relatively trivial, encountered with such frequency that we do not give them much thought . However, they can also be the origin of major questions that propose clear ethical issues, but that do not immediately include any indication of how we should deal with them .In some cases we can consult existing guidelines, either those which are specifically enumerated, for example by an ethics committee or an existing statement of policy, or those guidelines which are ‘commonly known’, often referred to as ‘common sense’, ‘rules of behavior’, or simply, ‘the way things are done’. Where we get the tools to evaluate ethical issues is only infrequently discussed or raised to the conscious level. And yet it is the tools that we use, the manner of approaching an ethical question, that will most likely influence the kind of response we will tend to give for an ethical dilemma.As already stated, most ethical questions arise in a context, in a situation. As a result, one can easily get the impression that the issue at hand is unique, that this ethical question is one that belongs to a particular area of life, and therefore that only an understanding that is firmly based in this specialized area is capable of responding adequately to the problem. Thus we see the growth of a number of specialized ‘ethics’ — medical ethics, business ethics, political ethics, the ethics of journalism, etc. — frequently accompanied by a specific ‘ethical code’.To the extent that the analysis of any issue, question or ethical dilemma demands that one have control of the facts of the case presenting itself, it is true that specific questions need to be approached with an adequate amount of specific competence . However, the common ground of these types of issues is their ethical nature. The question might realistically be put whether there is ‘one’ ethics which can guide us to an adequate response to most any question, or whether there are ‘many’ ethics, each specific to the area in which it is being called forth.The professional, or competent person, in any given field will tend to suggest that the ethical concerns s/he deals with can only be comprehended by someone who is thoroughly versed in that particular field. As far as comprehension of the facts is concerned, there appears to be little ground for arguing the point. Nevertheless, one could still ask about the basis upon which even the professional ethicist will make his/her judgments. Are the rules and structures of ethical codes still so specific that they apply only to one area of human behavior?