- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
II: Naturalism and Process
The Monist 64 (1):37-65 (1981)
Abstract
1. In this lecture I propose to explore some fundamental issues concerning the ontology of change and process. As in the first lecture, I shall formulate the argument in terms of the manifest world of middle sized objects, and only later, in the third lecture, draw some of its implications for the finer grained world with which science presents us.My notes
Similar books and articles
Foundations of a Matephysics of Pure Process, II: Naturalism and Process.Wilfrid Sellars - 1981 - The Monist 64 (1):37-65.
Foundations for a metaphysics of pure process: The Carus lectures of Wilfrid Sellars.Wilfrid Sellars - 1981 - The Monist 64 (1):3-90.
The Middle Does Not Hold.William A. Rottschaefer - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:361-369.
How Successful is Naturalism?Michael C. Rea - 2007 - In Georg Gasser (ed.), How Successful is Naturalism? Ontos-Verlag. pp. 105-116.
Naturalism, Knowledge, and Nature—Alvin Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism in Relationalist Cosmological Perspective.Richard Peters - 2011 - Process Studies 40 (1):206-207.
Back to Roy wood Sellars: Why his evolutionary naturalism is still worthwhile.Pouwel Slurink - 1996 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (3):425-449.
Normativity and Scientific Naturalism in Sellars’ ‘Janus‐Faced’ Space of Reasons.James R. O’Shea - 2010 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (3):459-471.
Religious Naturalism Today: The Rebirth of a Forgotten Alternative.Jerome Arthur Stone - 2008 - State University of New York Press.
Naturalism's Argument from Invincible Ignorance: A Response to Howard Van Till.William A. Dembski - unknown
Naturalism and the Space of Reasons in Mind and World.T. H. Ho - 2014 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 22 (1):49-62.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-02-02
Downloads
36 (#444,006)
6 months
4 (#792,011)
2015-02-02
Downloads
36 (#444,006)
6 months
4 (#792,011)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The particulate instantiation of homogeneous pink.Austen Clark - 1989 - Synthese 80 (August):277-304.
Two Fundamentally Different Perspectives on Time.Jesse M. Mulder - 2017 - Axiomathes 27 (3):295-320.
Sellars's ontological nominalism.Ryan Simonelli - 2021 - European Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):1041-1061.
Biosemiotics and Applied Evolutionary Epistemology: A Comparison.Nathalie Gontier & M. Facoetti - 2021 - In Nathalie Gontier & M. Facoetti (eds.), In: Pagni E., Theisen Simanke R. (eds) Biosemiotics and Evolution. Interdisciplinary Evolution Research, vol 6. Springer, Cham. Cham: pp. 175-199.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-pqwqt uwo