That Which Must not, Can not Be

Constructivist Foundations 15 (2):175-177 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Why Josef Mitterer’s Non-Dualism Is Inconsistent” by Stefan Weber.: I show that the issues raised in Weber’s target article are based on an inaccurate account of the history of philosophy and a questionable interpretation of non-dualism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Confusion with Consequences.Katharina Neges - 2019 - Constructivist Foundations 15 (2):178-180.
The Temporal Order in an Inconsistent Non-Dualism.Thomas Hainscho - 2019 - Constructivist Foundations 15 (2):185-186.
The Non-Dualist Narrative and the Present.Christian Meierhofer - 2019 - Constructivist Foundations 15 (2):187-189.
Why Josef Mitterer’s Non-Dualism Is Inconsistent.Stefan Weber - 2019 - Constructivist Foundations 15 (2):164-174.
Author’s Response: Philosophy without Ontology?Stefan Weber - 2019 - Constructivist Foundations 15 (2):189-193.
Non-Dualism and Self-Reference in Constructivism.Edmundo Balsemão Pires - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (2):209-211.
Some Limits of Non-dualism.A. G. Gross - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (2):242-246.
Non-dualism versus Conceptual Relativism.P. Kügler - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (2):247-252.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-12

Downloads
3 (#1,706,418)

6 months
2 (#1,192,610)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references