The failure to be rational

Philosophy of Science 49 (1):120-124 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a book and a series of articles Harold I. Brown has presented “the new theory of science”, which he characterizes as a “modest historicism”. I propose to examine Brown's contribution to the current debate on scientific method, and to show the inadequacy of his proposals. In particular, I want to concentrate on a fundamental concern of Brown's, namely, rationality.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
54 (#287,802)

6 months
7 (#592,566)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Being rational.Harold I. Brown - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (2):323-325.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On Being Rational.Harold I. Brown - 1978 - American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (4):241 - 248.
On being unreasonable.Morton L. Schagrin - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 40 (1):1-9.
For a Modest Historicism.Harold I. Brown - 1977 - The Monist 60 (4):540-555.
Theory choice and resistance to change.Andrew Lugg - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (2):227-243.

Add more references