Making interpersonal comparisons of the value of income with a hypothetical auction
Abstract
Economic policy decisions require comparisons of the gains and losses from policy choices to different people. If those gains can be valued in monetary terms, than all that is needed is a comparison of the value of income to different persons, which can be weights in cost-benefit analysis. An objective comparison of the value of income to different people has been long sought but never found. I propose that when money to be allocated is controlled by a group of people with equal control over that money, then a hypothetical auction for transfers of income between people can produce a collective judgment about the value of income that provides suitable weights, and is morally defensible in cases where the decision is made by the group collectively, e.g. when making government policy choices. I provide a method for calculating such weights from observed choices about distributing income, and discuss several desirable properties that they have.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Making Interpersonal Comparisons Coherently.Martin Barrett & Daniel Hausman - 1990 - Economics and Philosophy 6 (2):293.
Are Basic Capital Versus Basic Income Debates Too Narrow?Rajiv Prabhakar - 2018 - Basic Income Studies 13 (1).
Why justice requires transfers to offset income and wealth inequalities.Richard J. Arneson - 2002 - Social Philosophy and Policy 19 (1):172-200.
Values, preferences, and the citizen-consumer distinction in cost-benefit analysis.Shepley W. Orr - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (1):107-130.
Income-based equity weights in healthcare planning and policy.Anders Herlitz - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (8):510-514.
Porez na dohodak U republici hrvatskoj.Miljenko Javorovic - 2015 - Fip: Journal of Finance and Law 3 (1):83-100.
Costs and Benefits of Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Response to Bantz and MacLean.Peter Railton - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:261-271.
Economic Inequality and Income Distribution.D. G. Champernowne & F. A. Cowell - 1999 - Cambridge University Press.
Contextual and Individual Dimensions of Taxpayer Decision Making.Valentina L. Zamora, Gil B. Manzon & Jeffrey Cohen - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 126 (4):631-647.
Equivalent income and fair evaluation of health care.Marc Fleurbaey, Stéphane Luchini, Christophe Muller & Erik Schokkaert - unknown
On the Cognitive Argument for Cost-Benefit Analysis.Andreas Christiansen - 2018 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (2):217-230.
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Incommensurability and Rough Equality.J. Aldred - 2002 - Environmental Values 11 (1):27-47.
The impact of tax policy on economic growth, income distribution, and allocation of taxes.James D. Gwartney & Robert A. Lawson - 2006 - Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (2):28-52.
Natura economica in Environmental Valuation.Katrine Soma - 2006 - Environmental Values 15 (1):31 - 50.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-06-16
Downloads
225 (#56,015)
6 months
31 (#40,934)
2019-06-16
Downloads
225 (#56,015)
6 months
31 (#40,934)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
What is equality? Part 2: Equality of resources.Ronald Dworkin - 1981 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (4):283 - 345.