What (If Anything) Can Justify Basic Income Experiments? Balancing Costs and Benefits in Terms of Justice

Basic Income Studies 16 (1):11-25 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The central thesis of this essay is that basic income experiments are justified if their expected benefits in terms of justice exceed their expected costs in terms of justice. The benefits are a function of basic income’s effect on the level of justice attained in the context in which it is implemented, and the experiment’s impact on future policy-making. The costs comprise the sacrifices made as a result of the experiment’s interventional character, as well as the study’s opportunity costs. In light of the proposed standard of justification for basic income experiments, the factors that play a role in it, and the way these interact with one another, this essay provides some practical recommendations for researchers hoping to conduct such an experiment.

Similar books and articles

Do We Need Basic Income Experiments?Malcolm Torry - 2021 - Basic Income Studies 16 (1):39-54.
Justice and a citizens' basic income.Colin Farrelly - 1999 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (3):283–296.
A Basic Income Handbook. [REVIEW]Jason Burke Murphy - 2017 - Basic Income Studies 15 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-07-13

Downloads
279 (#69,679)

6 months
69 (#62,477)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Josette Daemen
Leiden University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The idea of justice.Amartya Sen - 2009 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
What is the point of equality.Elizabeth Anderson - 1999 - Ethics 109 (2):287-337.
Real Freedom for All: What Can Justify Capitalism.Philippe van Parijs - 1998 - Philosophical Quarterly 48 (192):394-396.

Add more references