Analyse & Kritik 28 (2):146-157 (2006)
AbstractIn this paper I show that Rawls’s contract apparatus in A Theory of Justice depends on a particular presumption that is in conflict with the goal of conserving environmental resources. He presumes that parties in the original position want as many resources as possible. I challenge Rawls’s approach by introducing a rational alternative to maximising. The strategy of satisficing merely goes for what is good enough. However, it seems that under conditions of scarcity Rawls’s maximising strategy is the only rational alternative. I therefore scrutinise the common account of scarcity. I distinguish between absolute and relative scarcity in order to show that scarcity is influenced by our decisions. If we would not accept the claim to as much as possible without further legitimisation, like Rawls does, then scarcity might not be as severe a problem. Finally, I reject Rawls’s proposed solution for dealing with problems of sustainability, namely his idea of the just savings principle. I conclude that Rawlsian Justice as Fairness is bad for the environment
Similar books and articles
A Rawlsian Perspective on Justice for the Disabled.Adam Cureton - 2008 - Essays in Philosophy 9 (1):55-76.
Rawlsian Justice.Fabienne Peter - 2009 - In Paul Anand, Prastanta Pattanaik & Clemens Puppe (eds.), Handbook of Rational and Social Choice. Oxford University Press. pp. 433--456.
The Problem of Historical Rectification for Rawlsian Theory.Juan Espindola & Moises Vaca - 2014 - Res Publica 20 (3):227-243.
Against Sen Against Rawls On Justice.Evan Riley - 2011 - Indian Journal of Human Development 5 (1):211-221.
First Steps Toward a Nonideal Theory of Justice.Marcus Arvan - 2014 - Ethics and Global Politics 7 (3):95-117.
How (Not) To Defend A Rawlsian Approach To Intergenerational Ethics. MacClellan - 2013 - Ethics and the Environment 18 (1):67-85.
The Problem of Global Distributive Justice in Rawls's The Law of Peoples.Marta Soniewicka - 2008 - Diametros 17:45-59.
Liberalism, Political Pluralism, and International Justice.Hahn Hsu - 1998 - Dissertation, The Ohio State University
Religious Belief in a Rawlsian Society.Richard L. Fern - 1987 - Journal of Religious Ethics 15 (1):33 - 58.
International Justice and Human Rights in the Political Philosophy of John Rawls.John Patrick Hayden - 1999 - Dissertation, University of South Africa (South Africa)
Justice, Reason, and the Human Good: On the Applicability of Rawlsian Justice to Non-Democratic and Less-Developed Societies.Xiaorong Li - 1993 - Dissertation, Stanford University
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Mikro-Zertifikate: Für Gerechtigkeit unter Luftverschmutzern.Olaf L. Müller - 2009 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 95 (2):167-198.
The Construction of a Sustainable Development in Times of Climate Change.Eric Brandstedt - 2013 - Dissertation, Lund University
Needs as Reference Points – When Marginal Gains to the Poor Do Not Matter.Arne Robert Weiß, Alexander Max Bauer & Stefan Traub - manuscript
Justice écologique et adaptation au changement climatique : le cas des petits territoires insulaires.Alexandre Berthe & Sylvie Ferrari - 2015 - Revue de Philosophie Économique 1 (1):103-133.