Justice and future generations

Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (1):70-83 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In A Theory of Justice, Rawls attempts to ground intergenerational justice by "virtual representation" through a thickening of the veil of ignorance. Contractors don't know to what generation they belong. This approach is flawed and will not result in the just savings principle Rawls hopes to justify. The project of grounding intergenerational duties on a social contractarian foundation is misconceived. Non-overlapping generations do not stand in relation to one another that is central to the contractarian approach.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
749 (#20,290)

6 months
99 (#40,134)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Donald Hubin
Ohio State University

Citations of this work

Intergenerational justice.Lukas Meyer - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Can We Harm Furture People?Alan Carter - 2001 - Environmental Values 10 (4):429-454.
The Circumstances of Intergenerational Justice.Eric Brandstedt - 2015 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 2 (1):33-56.
Rawls on Just Savings and Economic Growth.Marcos Picchio - forthcoming - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references