Hormone Therapy, Dilemmas, Medical Decisions

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (1):73-88 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The question of why women, in consultation with their physicians, should choose hormone therapy in response to menopause represents a renewed controversy at the beginning of the new century. Conflicting messages regarding the health risks and benefits of HT have been conveyed in the mainstream media, especially information in the media regarding the results of large-scale studies of the health impact of hormone therapy. Women who have been on one or another of the hormone replacement regimes have been forced to reconsider continuing on HT. Doctors who suggest these hormones to their patients are somewhat confused, as are perimenopausal women who are considering HT. Pharmaceutical companies that produce these compounds are worried, and public health officials are on the defensive.Media coverage of HT research has been extensive. In particular, two large-scale studies, one here in the U.S. and the other in Great Britain, have recently cast a negative light on the use of hormone therapy, after years of routine prescription of HT for menopausal women.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hormone Therapy, Dilemmas, Medical Decisions.Jay Schulkin - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (1):73-88.
The Haunting of Medical Journals.Adriane Fugh-Berman - 2010 - Plos Medicine 7 (9):e1000335.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
26 (#597,650)

6 months
8 (#506,113)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations