Facial beauty and fractal geometry

Abstract

What is it that makes a face beautiful? Average faces obtained by photographic (Galton 1878) or digital (Langlois & Roggman 1990) blending are judged attractive but not optimally attractive (Alley & Cunningham 1991) --- digital exaggerations of deviations from average face blends can lead to higher attractiveness ratings (Perrett, May, & Yoshikawa 1994). My novel approach to face design does not involve blending at all. Instead, the image of a female face with high ratings is composed from a fractal geometry based on rotated squares and powers of two. The corresponding geometric rules are more specific than those previously used by artists such as Leonardo and Duerer. They yield a short algorithmic description of all facial characteristics, many of which are compactly encodable with the help of simple feature detectors similar to those found in mammalian brains. This suggests that a face's beauty correlates with simplicity relative to the subjective observer's way of encoding it.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,070

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Female facial beauty.Victor S. Johnston - 1993 - Pragmatics and Cognition 8 (1):107-122.
Female facial beauty: The fertility hypothesis.Victor S. Johnston - 2000 - Pragmatics and Cognition 8 (1):107-122.
Female facial Beauty: the fertility hypothesis.Victor S. Johnston - 2000 - Pragmatics and Cognition 8 (1):107-122.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
14 (#995,559)

6 months
6 (#701,155)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What makes bodies beautiful.Anton Leist - 2003 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (2):187 – 219.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references