- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Genetic Enhancement
In Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer (eds.), A Companion to Bioethics. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 216–234 (2009)
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Possibility, Extent and Significance of Genetic Enhancement Should Human Genetic Enhancement Occur? Conclusion References.
genetic enhancement possibility, extent and significance of genetic enhancement extent of genetic enhancement and plundering kingdom of genes ethics of human enhancement special value in balance and diversity gap in power, wealth, and education dividing society humility, responsibility, and solidarity social costs ‐ enhancements self‐defeating
My notes
Similar books and articles
Genetic enhancement: Plan now to act later.Maxwell J. Mehlman - 2005 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (1):77-82.
The Ethics of Genetic Enhancement: Key Concepts and Future Prospects.Jonathan Anomaly & Tess Johnson - 2023 - In Routledge Handbook on The Ethics of Human Enhancement. London: Routledge Press. pp. 143-151.
Egalitarianism and Responsibility in the Genetic Future.Linda Barclay - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (2):119-134.
Can human genetic enhancement be prohibited?William Gardner - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (1):65-84.
The Better I Can Be: In Defence of Human Enhancement for a New Genetic Equality.Vera Lúcia Carapeto Raposo - 2022 - Canadian Journal of Bioethics / Revue canadienne de bioéthique 5 (2).
The Future of Education: Genetic Enhancement and Metahumanities.Stefan Lorenz Sorgner - 2015 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 25 (1):31-48.
Reshaping Human Intelligence: The Debate about Genetic Enhancement of Cognitive Functions.Michael Fuchs - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (2):165-181.
Gene Doping and the Responsibility of Bioethicists.Ashkan Atry, Mats G. Hansson & Ulrik Kihlbom - 2011 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 5 (2):149 - 160.
Human Enhancement.Fritz Allhoff, Patrick Lin & Daniel Moore - 2010 - In What is Nanotechnology and why does it Matter? Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 230–253.
Evolution, Genetic Engineering, and Human Enhancement.Russell Powell, Guy Kahane & Julian Savulescu - 2012 - Philosophy and Technology 25 (4):439-458.
Genetic Enhancement and Moral Attitudes Toward the Given.Terrance Mcconnell - 2011 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (4):369-380.
pt. VI. Genetics and enhancement. Population genetic research and screening: conceptual and ethical issues / Eric Juengst ; Enhancement / Thomas Murray ; Genetic interventions and the ethics of enhancement of human beings / Julian Savulescu ; Pharmacogenomics: ethical and regulatory issues. [REVIEW]Matthew DeCamp & Allen Buchanan - 2007 - In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford handbook of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
The wisdom of caution: Genetic enhancement and future children.Jason Borenstein - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (4):517-530.
Genetic Engineering.Dan W. Brock - 2003 - In R. G. Frey & C. H. Wellman (eds.), A Companion to Applied Ethics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 356–368.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-15
Downloads
13 (#1,036,661)
6 months
3 (#976,558)
2023-06-15
Downloads
13 (#1,036,661)
6 months
3 (#976,558)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Why is Cognitive Enhancement Deemed Unacceptable? The Role of Fairness, Deservingness, and Hollow Achievements.Nadira S. Faber, Julian Savulescu & Thomas Douglas - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
Rational Freedom and Six Mistakes of a Bioconservative.Julian Savulescu - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (7):1-5.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-zf4z4 uwo