Analog versus digital: Extrapolating from electronics to neurobiology

Neural Computation 10 (7):1601--1638 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We review the pros and cons of analog and digital computation. We propose that computation that is most efficient in its use of resources is neither analog computation nor digital computation but, rather, a mixture of the two forms. For maximum efficiency, the information and information-processing resources of the hybrid form must be distributed over many wires, with an optimal signal-to-noise ratio per wire. Our results suggest that it is likely that the brain computes in a hybrid fashion and that an underappreciated and important reason for the efficiency of the human brain, which consumes only 12 W, is the hybrid and distributed nature of its architecture.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Toward Analog Neural Computation.Corey J. Maley - 2018 - Minds and Machines 28 (1):77-91.
Physical Computation: A Mechanistic Account.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2015 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Neural and super-Turing computing.Hava T. Siegelmann - 2003 - Minds and Machines 13 (1):103-114.
Brains as analog-model computers.Oron Shagrir - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (3):271-279.
Chaotic neurons and analog computation.Kazuyuki Aihara & Jun Kyung Ryeu - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):810-811.
Varieties of Analog and Digital Representation.Whit Schonbein - 2014 - Minds and Machines 24 (4):415-438.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-10-12

Downloads
46 (#106,786)

6 months
5 (#1,552,255)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?