A Novel Defense of Scientific Realism [Book Review]

Journal of Philosophy 95 (4):204-209 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

0022362X

DOI

10.5840/jphil19989548

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Explanationist Defense of Scientific Realism.Dorit A. Ganson - 2001 - New York: Garland.
Counterfactuals and Scientific Realism.Michael J. Shaffer - 2012 - London and Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
A novel defense of scientific realism.Jarrett Leplin - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press.
How the growth of science ends theory change.Ludwig Fahrbach - 2011 - Synthese 180 (2):139-155.
Scientific realism and metaphysics.Stathis Psillos - 2005 - Ratio 18 (4):385–404.
Empirical Success or Explanatory Success: What Does Current Scientific Realism Need to Explain?Gerald Doppelt - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1076-1087.
How to be realistic about folk psychology.George Graham & Terence Horgan - 1988 - Philosophical Psychology 1 (1):69-81.
Scientific realism: how science tracks truth.Stathis Psillos - 1999 - New York: Routledge.
Scientific realism with a Humean face.Stathis Psillos - 2011 - In Steven French & Juha Saatsi (eds.), The Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Science. London: pp. 75-95.
Scientific Realism and the Neutrality of Method.Husain Sarkar - 1997 - Modern Schoolman 75 (1):65-78.
Three Paradigms of Scientific Realism: A Truthmaking Account.Jamin Asay - 2013 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27 (1):1-21.
Armstrong on Relational and Nonrelational Realism.Gail Fine - 1981 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62 (3):262-71.
Scientific vs. mathematical realism: The indispensability argument.Michael Resnik - 1995 - Philosophia Mathematica 3 (2):166-174.
A novel defense of scientific realism. Jarrett Leplin.Richard Healey - 2001 - Mind 110 (439):777-780.
Non‐defensible middle ground for experimental realism: Why we are justified to believe in colored quarks.Michela Massimi - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (1):36-60.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
103 (#168,193)

6 months
1 (#1,479,630)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Husain Sarkar
Louisiana State University

Citations of this work

Empirical equivalence and underdetermination.Husain Sarkar - 2000 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (2):187 – 197.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references