Scientific Realism and Basic Common Sense

Kairos. Revista de Filosofia and Ciência 10:11-24 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper considers the relationship between science and common sense. It takes as its point of departure, Eddington’s distinction between the table of physics and the table of common sense, as well as Eddington’s suggestion that science shows common sense to be false. Against the suggestion that science shows common sense to be false, it is argued that there is a form of common sense, basic common sense, which is not typically overthrown by scientific research. Such basic common sense is strongly confirmed by our everyday experience and may itself serve as the basic for scientific realism.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-09-29

Downloads
570 (#33,260)

6 months
77 (#74,109)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Howard Sankey
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

Scientific Realism and the Conflict with Common Sense.Howard Sankey - 2020 - In Wenceslao J. Gonzalez (ed.), New Approaches to Scientific Realism. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 68-83.
A Dilemma for the Scientific Realist.Howard Sankey - 2018 - Spontaneous Generations 9 (1):65-67.
Subject and Object in Scientific Realism.Howard Sankey - 2017 - In Jassen Andreev, Emil Lensky & Paula Angelova (eds.), Das Interpretative Universum. Würzburg: Konigshausen & Neumann. pp. 293-306.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Patterns of Discovery.Norwood R. Hanson, A. D. Ritchie & Henryk Mehlberg - 1960 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (40):346-349.
The Nature of the Physical World.A. Eddington - 1928 - Humana Mente 4 (14):252-255.
The method of truth in metaphysics.Donald Davidson - 1977 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2 (1):244-254.
The Nature of the Physical World. [REVIEW]Arthur E. Murphy - 1930 - Philosophical Review 39 (5):502.

Add more references