Science and Peer Review: The Canadian Standard-Setting Experience [Book Review]

Science, Technology and Human Values 10 (4):37-45 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Science and Trans-Science in Standard Setting.Giandomenico Majone - 1984 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 9 (1):15-22.
Rational Disagreement in Peer Review. [REVIEW]Stevan Harnad - 1985 - Science, Technology and Human Values 10 (3):55-62.
Peer Review and Public Policy. [REVIEW]Sheila Jasanoff & Daryl Chubin - 1985 - Science, Technology and Human Values 10 (3):3-5.
Peer Review and the Consensus Development Process. [REVIEW]John T. Kalberer - 1985 - Science, Technology and Human Values 10 (3):63-72.
Commentary: Peer Review is Alive and Well in the United States. [REVIEW]Arie Rip - 1985 - Science, Technology and Human Values 10 (3):82-86.
Sheldon Krimsky: A Peer without Peer.Edward J. Hackett - 2022 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 47 (4):631-633.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-27

Downloads
5 (#1,558,750)

6 months
4 (#1,004,582)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Buckets of Resistance: Standards and the Effectiveness of Citizen Science.Gwen Ottinger - 2010 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 35 (2):244-270.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Resolution of Technically Intensive Public Policy Disputes.Harvey Brooks - 1984 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 9 (1):39-50.

Add more references