Ockham’s razor and reasoning about information flow

Synthese 167 (2):391 - 408 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is the minimal algebraic structure to reason about information flow? Do we really need the full power of Boolean algebras with co-closure and de Morgan dual operators? How much can we weaken and still be able to reason about multi-agent scenarios in a tidy compositional way? This paper provides some answers.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

When Do Introspection Axioms Matter for Multi-Agent Epistemic Reasoning?Wesley H. Holliday, Yifeng Ding & Cedegao Zhang - 2019 - Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 297:121–139.
A hybrid logic for reasoning about knowledge and topology.Bernhard Heinemann - 2008 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 17 (1):19-41.
Term-modal logics.Melvin Fitting, Lars Thalmann & Andrei Voronkov - 2001 - Studia Logica 69 (1):133-169.
Boolean algebras arising from information systems.Ivo Düntsch & Ewa Orłowska - 2004 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 127 (1-3):77-98.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
97 (#57,000)

6 months
6 (#1,472,471)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Modes of Adjointness.M. Menni & C. Smith - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic (2-3):1-27.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge and belief.Jaakko Hintikka - 1962 - Ithaca, N.Y.,: Cornell University Press.
Logics of public communications.Jan Plaza - 2007 - Synthese 158 (2):165 - 179.

View all 9 references / Add more references