- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Legislative Impediments to Judicial Consideration of Moral Blameworthiness in Sentencing FASD Affected Offenders – A Canadian Perspective
In Ian Binnie, Sterling Clarren & Egon Jonsson (eds.), Ethical and Legal Perspectives in Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders : Foundational Issues. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 241-250 (2018)
Abstract
The fundamental principle behind sentencing in most jurisdictions is the idea of proportionality. Although the concept of proportionality is found in the Criminal Code, it existed as touchstone for judges well before it was formally placed in the Code in 1996 as part of a comprehensive set of sentencing principles in Bill C-41.My notes
Similar books and articles
Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory: Essays in Honour of Andrew von Hirsch.Andrew Ashworth & Martin Wasik (eds.) - 1998 - Oxford University Press UK.
Proportionality in Sentencing and the Restorative Justice Paradigm: 'Just Deserts' for Victims and Defendants Alike? [REVIEW]Tyrone Kirchengast - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (2):197-213.
The ethics of sentencing white-collar criminals.Phillip Balsmeier & Jennifer Kelly - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (2):143 - 152.
Proportionate Sentencing: Exploring the Principles.Andrew Von Hirsch & Andrew Ashworth - 2005 - Oxford University Press UK.
Deserved Delayed Release? The Communicative Theory of Punishment and Indeterminate Prison Sentences.William Bülow - 2018 - Criminal Justice Ethics 37 (2):164-181.
Desert, Control, and Moral Responsibility.Douglas W. Portmore - 2019 - Acta Analytica 34 (4):407-426.
The common law, shared power and judicial review.Craig Paul - 2004 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 24 (2):237-257.
Toulmin-based computational modelling of judicial discretion in sentencing.Andrew Vincent & John Zaleznikow - unknown
Is Blameworthiness Forever?Andrew C. Khoury & Benjamin Matheson - 2018 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 4 (2):204-224.
Principle, Discretion, and Symbolic Power in Rousseau's Account of Judicial Virtue.Eoin Daly - 2016 - Ratio Juris 29 (2):223-245.
A Sketch of a Theory of Moral Blameworthiness.Peter A. Graham - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2):388-409.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-01-28
Downloads
5 (#1,531,351)
6 months
4 (#783,550)
2019-01-28
Downloads
5 (#1,531,351)
6 months
4 (#783,550)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-659b74868d-gf2vn uwo