In Nature’s Interests [Book Review]

Philosophical Review 109 (4):598-601 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book seeks to undermine the widespread and tenacious idea that animal rights philosophies, being axiologically individualistic, are antithetical to the environmentalist agenda, commonly viewed as underwritten by a holistic meta-ethical framework. To this end, Varner defends a form of biocentric individualism, according to which all living organisms have interests, ones that generate prima facie entitlements, but which can be overridden in appropriate circumstances. He defends a sentientist principle that the lives of organisms with conscious desires have priority over those who lack the capacity for such desires, and a anthropocentric principle that gives priority to certain types of inclusive interests that only human beings have. He then argues that these principles are not only consistent with, but lend considerable support to, the environmentalist agenda.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In Nature’s Interests? [REVIEW]James W. Shepherd - 2005 - International Studies in Philosophy 37 (4):171-172.
In Nature’s Interests? [REVIEW]David Schmidtz - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (4):433-436.
Beyond Sax and Welfare Interests.Shari Collins-Chobanian - 2000 - Environmental Ethics 22 (2):133-148.
Beyond Sax and Welfare Interests.Shari Collins-Chobanian - 2000 - Environmental Ethics 22 (2):133-148.
Humanity, Holism, and Environmental Ethics.Lawrence E. Johnson - 1983 - Environmental Ethics 5 (4):345-354.
The Moral Significance of Interests.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1982 - Environmental Ethics 4 (4):345-358.
Humanity, holism, and environmental ethics.Lawrence E. Johnson - 1983 - Environmental Ethics 5 (4):345-354.
The moral significance of interests.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1982 - Environmental Ethics 4 (4):345-358.
The “Interests” of Natural Objects.Jay E. Kantor - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (2):163-171.
The “interests” of natural objects.Jay E. Kantor - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (2):163-171.
Do Animal Have Interests Worthy of Our Moral Interest?Peter Miller - 1983 - Environmental Ethics 5 (4):319-333.
How should animals be treated?Jack Lee - 2008 - Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (2):181 – 189.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-12

Downloads
38 (#417,943)

6 months
2 (#1,188,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Rowlands
University of Miami

Citations of this work

Sentientism, Motivation, and Philosophical Vulcans.Luke Roelofs - 2023 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 104 (2):301-323.
Animal pain.Colin Allen - 2004 - Noûs 38 (4):617-643.
Schopenhauer on the Rights of Animals.Stephen Puryear - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy 25 (2):250-269.
From human rights to sentient rights.Alasdair Cochrane - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (5):655-675.
Biological Interests, Normative Functions, and Synthetic Biology.Sune Holm - 2012 - Philosophy and Technology 25 (4):525-541.

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references