Oxford University Press (1998)
AbstractThis book offers a powerful response to what Varner calls the "two dogmas of environmental ethics"--the assumptions that animal rights philosophies and anthropocentric views are each antithetical to sound environmental policy. Allowing that every living organism has interests which ought, other things being equal, to be protected, Varner contends that some interests take priority over others. He defends both a sentientist principle giving priority to the lives of organisms with conscious desires and an anthropocentric principle giving priority to certain very inclusive interests which only humans have. He then shows that these principles not only comport with but provide significant support for environmental goals
Similar books and articles
Environmental ethics and the rights of future generations.Bryan G. Norton - 1982 - Environmental Ethics 4 (4):319-337.
Beyond Sax and welfare interests.Shari Collins-Chobanian - 2000 - Environmental Ethics 22 (2):133-148.
The Ethics of the Ecology of Fear against the Nonspeciesist Paradigm: A Shift in the Aims of Intervention in Nature.Oscar Horta - 2010 - Between the Species 13 (10):163-187.
Do animal have interests worthy of our moral interest?Peter Miller - 1983 - Environmental Ethics 5 (4):319-333.
Humanity, holism, and environmental ethics.Lawrence E. Johnson - 1983 - Environmental Ethics 5 (4):345-354.
The animal rights/environmental ethics debate: The environmental perspective.Gary E. Varner - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (3):279-282.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Animal Rights and the Duty to Harm: When to be a Harm Causing Deontologist.C. E. Abbate - 2020 - Journal for Ethics and Moral Philosophy 3 (1):5-26.
Schopenhauer on the Rights of Animals.Stephen Puryear - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy 25 (2):250-269.
References found in this work
No references found.