A reply to van Eck

Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 14:227-240 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Bryn mawr classical review 97.6.12.William Stephens - manuscript
Separation: A Reply to Morrison.Gail Fine - 1985 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 3:159-65.
Separation: a reply to Fine.Donald Morrison - 1985 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 3:167-173.
The Unity of the Phaedrus: A Reply to Heath.”.C. J. Rowe - 1989 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 7:175-88.
Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy: Volume Xi: 1993.C. C. W. Taylor (ed.) - 1993 - Clarendon Press.
Aristotelian dualism: reply to Howard Robinson.Martha C. Nussbaum - 1984 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2:197-207.
Reply to Jonathan Barnes,“Epicurean Signs”.A. A. Long - 1988 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy:135-144.
ECK, L. J.: The metaphysics of Descartes. [REVIEW]A. M. Ritchie - 1967 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 45:125.
Disunity in aristotelian virtues: a reply to Richard Kraut.Terence H. Irwin - 1988 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy:87-90.
Reply to Michael Frede's 'Being and Becoming in Plato'.A. Code - 1988 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy:53-60.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Causation in the phaedo.Sean Kelsey - 2004 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (1):21–43.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references