In Richard Polt & Jon Wittrock (eds.), The Task of Philosophy in the Anthropocene: Axial Echoes in Global Space. New York: Rowman & Littlefield International. pp. 175-192 (2018)
AbstractThe proposal that the earth has entered a new epoch called “the Anthropocene” has touched a nerve . One unsettling part of having our ecological finitude thrust upon us with the term “Anthropocene” is that, as Nietzsche said of the death of God, we ourselves are supposed to be the collective doer responsible here, yet this is a deed which no one individual meant to do and whose implications no one fully comprehends. For the pessimists about humanity, the implications seem rather straightforward: humanity will die. Yet, as we will explore in this paper, the death that we may be facing cannot be assumed to be simply biological death or extinction. Indeed, even if we are not running headlong into a mass extinction and biological demise, we do seem to be facing an ontological death. Our ecological finitude is the harbinger of our ontological finitude. The vulnerability we confront in the Anthropocene is what Jonathan Lear, in a different context, called ontological vulnerability. Worlds die too; the ways of life they sustain can become impossible, ceasing to make sense and matter. The constitutive susceptibility of all human worlds to their eventual collapse is what we mean by ontological finitude. This is what we face as presumed denizens in a dawning Anthropocene.
Similar books and articles
Saving Earth: encountering Heidegger's philosophy of technology in the anthropocene.Jochem Zwier & Vincent Blok - 2017 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 21 (2/3):222-242.
Ecological Trust: An Object-Oriented Perspective.Tom Sparrow - 2017 - Philosophy Today 61 (1):99-115.
Finitude and Theological Anthropology: An Interdisciplinary Exploration Into Theological Dimensions of Finitude.Jan-Olav Henriksen - 2011 - Peeters.
Beyond Adaptation and Anthropomorphism.Danika Drury-Melnyk - 2017 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 21 (2/3):363-385.
Loss of Epistemic Self-Determination in the Anthropocene.Ian Werkheiser - 2017 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 20 (2):156-167.
Ethics and Finitude: Heideggerian Contributions to Moral Philosophy.Lawrence J. Hatab (ed.) - 2000 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Heidegger on Human Finitude: Beginning at the End.Oren Magid - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):657-676.
Rethinking Vulnerability in the Age of Anthropocene: Toward Ecologizing Education.Huey‐li Li - 2017 - Educational Theory 67 (4):435-451.
Comments on Jonathan Lear’s Radical Hope.Hubert L. Dreyfus - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 144 (1):63-70.
Deconstructing Anthropos: A Critical Legal Reflection on ‘Anthropocentric’ Law and Anthropocene ‘Humanity’.Anna Grear - 2015 - Law and Critique 26 (3):225-249.
Temporal finitude and finitude of possibility: The double meaning of death in being and time.Havi Carel - 2007 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (4):541 – 556.
Four Problems, Four Directions for Environmental Humanities: Toward Critical Posthumanities for the Anthropocene. Neimanis, Åsberg & Hedrén - 2015 - Ethics and the Environment 20 (1):67-97.
The Natural History of Aesthetics.Thomas H. Ford - 2015 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 9 (2):220-239.
The Anthropocene Diet: perversions of consumers facing the environmental crisis.Prates Vinicius - 2017 - International Journal of Žižek Studies 11 (1).
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
There Is No Anthropocene: Climate Change, Species-Talk, and Political Economy.M. Lepori - 2015 - Télos 2015 (172):103-124.
The Anthropocene, Ethics, and the Nature of Nature.Z. Trachtenberg - 2015 - Télos 2015 (172):38-58.