Reduction: Some criteria and criticisms of the structuralist concept

Erkenntnis 27 (2):231 - 256 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Inter-theoretical reduction has always been a major topic in the structuralist philosophy of science. This paper reviews criteria of adequacy which were put forward by Adams, Sneed, Stegmuller, Mayr, Pearce, Kamlah, and Mormann. The criteria are formalized in a simplified structuralist model, and the logical relations between them are investigated. It turns out that various parts of these criteria are incompatible.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Scribbling on the blank sheet: Eddington's structuralist conception of objects.Steven French - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (2):227-259.
Problem reduction: Some thoughts.Thomas Nickles - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):107-133.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
61 (#263,631)

6 months
12 (#213,237)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?