Review of Paul Andrew Roth: Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences: A Case for Methodological Pluralism [Book Review]

Ethics 99 (2):434-435 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/293079

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences: A Case for Methodological Pluralism. [REVIEW]Alan Nelson - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (3):679-681.
Book Reviews : Paul A. Roth, Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences: A Case for Methodological Pluralism. Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London, 1987. Pp. xii, 250, $26.95 (cloth. [REVIEW]Dennis Rohatyn - 1991 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (3):412-415.
Paul A. Roth, "Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences: A Case for Methodological Pluralism". [REVIEW]Stephen Turner - 1990 - Theory and Society 19 (2):252.
Book Review:Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences: A Case for Methodological Pluralism. Paul A. Roth. [REVIEW]Arthur L. Stinchcombe - 1989 - Ethics 99 (2):434-.
Book Reviews : Paul A. Roth, Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences: A Case for Methodological Pluralism. Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London, 1987. Pp. xii, 250, $26.95 (cloth. [REVIEW]Dennis Rohatyn - 1991 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (3):412-415.
I Feyerabend's 'against method': The case for methodological pluralism.Paul Tibbetts - 1977 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 7 (3):265-275.
New Philosophy of Social Science: Problems of Indeterminacy.Paul A. Roth - 1995 - Metaphilosophy 26 (4):440-448.
Pluralism, indeterminacy and the social sciences: Reply to Ingram and Meehan. [REVIEW]James Bohman - 1997 - Human Studies 20 (4):441-458.
Evidence for Use: Causal Pluralism and the Role of Case Studies in Political Science Research.Sharon Crasnow - 2011 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (1):26-49.
New Philosophy of Social Science: Problems of Indeterminacy.James Bohman - 1993 - MIT Press.
Theories, practices, and pluralism: A pragmatic interpretation of critical social science.James Bohman - 1999 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (4):459-480.
New Philosophy of Social Science: Problems of Indeterminacy.[author unknown] - 1997 - Human Studies 20 (4):441-458.
Methodological Anti-Naturalism, Norms and Participant Observation.Julie Zahle - 2016 - In Mark Risjord (ed.), Normativity and Naturalism in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Routledge. pp. 78-95.
Quine, Indeterminacy and Meaning: A Critical Evaluation of the Indeterminacy of Translation Doctrine, in the Light of Recent Comments on Its Methodological Implications for Social Science.D. L. Gunson - 1991
William James and Methodological Pluralism: Bridging the Qualitative and Quantitative Divide.Bradford Wiggins - 2009 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 30 (3).

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
9 (#1,254,017)

6 months
2 (#1,198,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul A. Roth
University of California, Santa Cruz

Citations of this work

Feminist Philosophy of Science.Lynn Hankinson Nelson - 2002 - In Peter Machamer & Michael Silberstein (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 312–331.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references