On Fodor's distinction between strong and weak equivalence in machine simulation
Philosophy of Science 40 (March):118-120 (1973)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
DOI
10.1086/288501
My notes
Similar books and articles
The nervous system as physical machine: With special reference to the origin of adaptive behaviour.W. R. Ashby - 1947 - Mind 56 (January):44-59.
Epistemological observations about mind-machine equivalence.Farzad Didehvar & Mohammad Saleh Zareepour - 2007
Psychological Explanation: An Introduction To The Philosophy Of Psychology.Jerry A. Fodor - 1968 - Ny: Random House.
Functional equivalence and the defense of materialism.Robert K. Shope - 1973 - Philosophical Forum 4 (4):500-12.
More on Fodor's distinction between strong and weak simulations.Yorick Wilks - 1974 - Philosophy of Science 41 (4):408-411.
Representational capacity, intentional ascription, and the slippery slope.Stuart Silvers - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (3):463-473.
Strong, weak and functional equivalence in machine simulation.A. Rosenberg & N. J. Mackintosh - 1974 - Philosophy of Science 41 (December):412-414.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
12 (#805,104)
6 months
1 (#447,993)
2009-01-28
Downloads
12 (#805,104)
6 months
1 (#447,993)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Strong, weak and functional equivalence in machine simulation.A. Rosenberg & N. J. Mackintosh - 1974 - Philosophy of Science 41 (December):412-414.
More on Fodor's distinction between strong and weak simulations.Yorick Wilks - 1974 - Philosophy of Science 41 (4):408-411.
