On Christian philosophy: Una Vera philosophia?

The Monist 75 (3):354 - 380 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophy, as Aquinas, and many others, described it-- as a demonstrative progression from self-evident premises to evident (or even necessary [Scotus]) conclusions,-- is rarely attempted nowadays, even by "scholastic" philosophers. Demonstrative success,-- that is, entirely to eliminate competitors to one's conclusions, -- is not the expectation now, nor has it been the achievement of philosophers historically. Thus, some restrictions upon starting points may be relaxed as unnecessary, e.g. that they be self-evident.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Precepts of the Decalogue and the Problem of Self-Evidence.James M. Jacobs - 2007 - International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):399-415.
Philosophy in a Time of Exile.Marianne Djuth - 2007 - Augustinian Studies 38 (1):281-300.
Illocutionary negation.Vera Peetz - 1979 - Philosophia 8 (4):639-644.
Chisholm on the directly evident.Margery Bedford Naylor - 1978 - Philosophia 7 (3-4):423-440.
Forgiveness and Christian ethics.Anthony Bash - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Congiunzione e contraddizione.Achille C. Varzi - 2007 - In Francesco Altea & Francesco Berto (eds.), Scenari dell’impossibile. La contraddizione nel pensiero contemporaneo. Il Poligrafo. pp. 63–86.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
97 (#178,275)

6 months
15 (#166,963)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Ross
PhD: Brown University; Last affiliation: University of Pennsylvania

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references