Moore's paradox and Crimmins's case

Analysis 62 (2):167-171 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Moore’s paradox occurs with sentences, such as (1) It’s raining and I don’t think it’s raining. which are self-defeating in a way that prevents one from making an asser- tion with them.1 But Mark Crimmins has given us a case of a sentence that is syntactically just like (1) but is nonetheless assertible. Suppose I know somebody, and know or have excellent reason to believe that I know that very person under some other guise. I do not know what that other guise is, though I do know that I believe that the person I know under that other guise is an idiot.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
299 (#65,766)

6 months
7 (#416,569)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Rosenthal
CUNY Graduate Center

References found in this work

Other Minds.J. L. Austin - 2000 - In Sven Bernecker & Fred I. Dretske (eds.), Knowledge: Readings in Contemporary Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
Symposium: Other Minds.J. Wisdom, J. L. Austen, J. L. Austin & A. J. Ayer - 1946 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 20:122-197.
Res cogitans: an essay in rational psychology.Zeno Vendler - 1972 - Ithaca [N.Y.]: Cornell University Press.
Saying and Disbelieving.Max Black - 1952 - Analysis 13 (2):25-33.
Moore's paradox and consciousness.David M. Rosenthal - 1995 - Philosophical Perspectives 9:313-33.

View all 8 references / Add more references